Immobilisation versus early ankle movement for treating acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults

0Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of immobilisation compared with early movement protocols for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keene, D. J., Williams, M. A., Segar, A. H., Byrne, C., & Lamb, S. E. (2016, February 25). Immobilisation versus early ankle movement for treating acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free