Financial Executives’ Responses to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Reporting and Auditing

  • Csere P
  • Estep C
  • Griffith E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article summarizes “How do financial executives respond to the use of artificial intelligence in financial reporting and auditing?” (Estep, Griffith, and MacKenzie 2024; hereafter EGM). EGM survey financial executives about their perceptions of AI in financial reporting and experimentally examines how they would incorporate AI-generated information when resolving proposed audit adjustments. EGM find that financial executives do not have negative perceptions of AI. Further, in a hypothetical scenario, they find that when a financial executive’s company uses AI to help prepare an accounting estimate, financial executives book larger audit adjustments if auditors use AI to audit the estimate than if auditors do not use AI. If a financial executive’s company does not use AI, auditors’ use of AI has minimal influence on financial executives’ decisions. This paper provides insights for practice based on EGM’s findings.JEL Classifications: M41; M42; O33.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Csere, P., Estep, C., Griffith, E. E., & MacKenzie, N. L. (2025). Financial Executives’ Responses to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Reporting and Auditing. Current Issues in Auditing, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2025-014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free