Single high-dose vs. fractionated radiotherapy: Effects on plant growth rates

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the differential effects of fractionated vs. high-dose radiotherapy on plant growth. Background: Interest in hypofractionated radiotherapy has increased substantially in recent years as tumours (especially of the lung, prostate, and liver) can be irradiated with ever greater accuracy due to technological improvements. The effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on plant growth have been studied extensively, yet few studies have investigated the effect of high-dose, hypofractionated radiotherapy on plant growth development. Materials and methods: A total of 150 plants from the genus Capsicum annuum were randomized to receive fractionated radiotherapy (5 doses of 10. Gy each), single high-dose (SHD) radiotherapy (single 50. Gy dose), or no radiotherapy (control group). Irradiation was delivered via linear accelerator and all samples were followed daily for 26 days to assess and compare daily growth. Results: On day 26, plants in the control, fractionated, and SHD groups had grown to a mean height of 7.55. cm, 4.32. cm, and 2.94. cm, respectively. These differences in overall growth were highly significant (P=0.005). The SHD group showed the least amount of growth. Conclusions: SHD effectively stunts plant growth and development. Despite the evident differences between plant and animal cells, ionizing radiation is believed to work in a similar manner in all biological cells. These findings highlight the need to continue investigating the use of hypofractionated schemes in humans to improve cancer treatment outcomes. © 2013.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guedea, M., Castel, A., Arnalte, M., Mollera, A., Muñoz, V., & Guedea, F. (2013). Single high-dose vs. fractionated radiotherapy: Effects on plant growth rates. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 18(5), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2013.07.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free