Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial

4Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Medical crises occur rather seldom in the primary care setting, but when they do, initial management impacts on morbidity and mortality. Factors that impede the performance of emergency interventions in primary care have not been studied through in-situ simulation. Checklists reportedly improve crisis management. Design: This randomized controlled trial evaluated emergency intervention performance during two scenarios (hypoglycemia-coma and anaphylaxis-cardiac arrest) simulated at primary care centers, and whether checklist access improved performance. Setting: Twenty-two primary care centers in Southern Sweden participated in the study. Subjects: A total of 347 personnel performed 100 simulations, 45 with and 55 without checklist access. Main outcome measures: Time and impediments to performance of five emergency interventions in each scenario. Results: On 28 of the 37 occasions when the adrenalin auto-injector was employed, the administration technique was incorrect. In 9 of 49 scenarios, teams had trouble locating the 30% glucose solution. Median time to supplemental oxygen administration during the first scenario was 186 s compared with 96 s during the second scenario (p < 0.001). Checklist access had no significant impact on time to performance of emergency interventions, aside from shorter time to adequate glucose or glucagon administration (median times 632 s with, 756 s without checklist access; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Unfamiliarity with local emergency equipment impedes the performance of emergency interventions during crises simulated in the primary care setting. Simply providing checklist access does not improve the performance of emergency interventions.KEY POINTS Little is known about the factors that affect the performance of emergency interventions in the primary care setting. Unfamiliarity with local emergency equipment impedes the performance of emergency interventions during crises simulated in the primary care setting. Simply providing crisis checklist access does not improve the performance of emergency interventions in the primary care setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dryver, E., Knutsson, J., Ekelund, U., & Bergenfelz, A. (2021). Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 39(4), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1973250

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free