Maternal and fetal outcome in emergency versus elective caesarean section

  • Agrawal S
  • Agarwal V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section preferred as an emergency or elective procedure are entirely different entities according to measures taken, facilities and skilled staff available and preparation done. It has been shown that risk of surgical complications is greater with emergency compared with elective caesarean section.Methods: Present study is a retrospective study, designed to evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes in elective versus emergency caesarean section performed at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2016.Results: Out of 2156 caesarean, 1628 were emergency and 528 were elective caesarean section.  In our study overall intra operative complications were 11.08% which was mainly contributed to emergency group.Conclusions: The elective caesarean section shows less maternal and perinatal complications as compared to emergency caesarean sections. Increasing incidence of emergency caesarean section can be reduced by encouraging all pregnant females to visit antenatal clinics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Agrawal, S., & Agarwal, V. K. (2018). Maternal and fetal outcome in emergency versus elective caesarean section. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7(12), 4845. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free