Archaeology and human-animal relations: Thinking through anthropocentrism

102Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Archaeology is a field of research that relies largely on the remains of past humans and nonhuman animals and the traces of their interactions within a range of material conditions. In archaeology, as in sociocultural anthropology, the dominant analytical perspective on human-animal relations is ontologically anthropocentric: The study of the human use of nonhuman animals for the benefit of human beings, and scholarly inquiry that is largely for the sake of elucidating what nonhuman animals can tell us about the human condition. This review outlines the historical trajectory of Anglo-American archaeology's encounters with animal remains, and human-animal interactions, within this framework and considers recent attempts to move beyond anthropocentrism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boyd, B. (2017). Archaeology and human-animal relations: Thinking through anthropocentrism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free