This chapter sets out the philosophical debate about the meaning of integrity. First, focusing on the case of Arthur Andersen, it examines different philosophical views of integrity, including the integrated self; moral identity; adhering to bottom-line principles, strength of will, the act of judgment; and as a connecting or epistemic virtue. From this will emerge a view of integrity as connective and complex. Alternative, narrower, views of integrity are then critically examined. Focusing on the re-presentation of identity, the chapter concludes by arguing for the importance of responsibility in holding together the different aspects of integrity.
CITATION STYLE
Robinson, S. (2016). Philosophy and Integrity. In Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility (Vol. Part F1749, pp. 1–30). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51553-7_1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.