Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons

24Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP), the prototype human acute phase protein, may be causally involved in various human diseases. As CRP has appeared much earlier in evolution than antibodies and nonetheless partly utilizes the same biological structures, it is likely that CRP has been the first antibody-like molecule in the evolution of the immune system. Like antibodies, CRP may cause autoimmune reactions in a variety of human pathologies. Consequently, therapeutic targeting of CRP may be of utmost interest in human medicine. Over the past two decades, however, pharmacological targeting of CRP has turned out to be extremely difficult. Currently, the easiest, most effective and clinically safest method to target CRP in humans may be the specific extracorporeal removal of CRP by selective apheresis. The latter has recently shown promising therapeutic effects, especially in acute myocardial infarction and COVID-19 pneumonia. This review summarizes the pros and cons of applying this novel technology to patients suffering from various diseases, with a focus on its use in cardiovascular medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Torzewski, J., Brunner, P., Ries, W., Garlichs, C. D., Kayser, S., Heigl, F., & Sheriff, A. (2022, April 1). Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons. Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071771

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free