A Comparison of Experimental Methods to Induce Mental Fatigue

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Appropriate induction of mental fatigue in the lab is imperative for properly investigating the effects of mental fatigue on behavior. In this study, we aimed to (1) identify a task for inducing mental fatigue that is both effective (i.e. sufficiently demanding) and feasible (i.e., sufficiently short in duration), and (2) to assess its effects on boredom, loss of motivation, and sleepiness. Therefore, we compared the following tasks: (1) an individualized TloadDback task (16 minutes), (2) an individualized TloadDback task (32 minutes), (3) an N-back task (32 minutes), and (4) a control task in the form of watching a documentary (32 minutes), using a within-participants design with 30 participants. Subjective and objective outcome measures were used to evaluate levels of fatigue, boredom, motivation and sleepliness pre- and post-task. While all investigated tasks induced mental fatigue, the individualized TloadDback struck the best balance between effectiveness and feasibility and should therefore be preferred in experimental research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bach, M. M., Brandstetter, K., Stins, J., & Beek, P. J. (2026). A Comparison of Experimental Methods to Induce Mental Fatigue. Perceptual and Motor Skills. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125261420694

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free