A comparative study of oral cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy in the treatment of alopecia areata

20Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Various systemic agents have been assessed for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA); however, there is a paucity of comparative studies. Objective: To assess and compare cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy as treatments for AA with regard to effectiveness and safety. Methods: Data were collected from 88 patients who received at least 3 months of oral cyclosporine (n=51) or betamethasone minipulse therapy (n=37) for AA. Patients with ≥50% of terminal hair regrowth in the alopecic area were considered responders. Results: The responder of the cyclosporine group was 54.9% and that of the betamethasone minipulse group was 37.8%. In the cyclosporine group, patients with mild AA were found to respond better to the treatment. Based on the patient self-assessments, 70.6% of patients in the cyclosporine group and 43.2% of patients in the betamethasone minipulse group rated their hair regrowth as excellent or good. Side effects were less frequent in the cyclosporine group. Conclusion: Oral cyclosporine appeared to be superior to betamethasone minipulse therapy in terms of treatment effectiveness and safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, Y. H., Kim, S. L., Lee, K. C., Kim, M. J., Park, K. H., Lee, W. J., … Kim, D. W. (2016). A comparative study of oral cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy in the treatment of alopecia areata. Annals of Dermatology, 28(5), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free