Histopathological evaluation of different methods of experimental induction of periapical periodontitis

10Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study evaluated histopathologically different methods of experimental induction of periapical periodontitis. The radiographic and microbiological evaluations have been performed in a previous investigation. Fifty-seven root canals from dogs' teeth were assigned to 4 groups. In GI (n=14) and GII (n=14), the root canals were exposed to oral environment for 180 days; in GIII (n=14) and GIV (n=15) the root canals were exposed for 7 days and then the access cavities were restored and remained sealed for 53 days. The root apices of GI and GIII were perforated, whilst those of GII and GIV remained intact. After induction of periapical periodontitis, the dogs were euthanized. Serial sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Data of the histopathological evaluation were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests at 5% significance level. The inflammatory periapical reaction and resorption of mineralized tissues were less intense in GII than in the other groups (p<0.05). There was no histopathological difference among the experimentally induced periapical lesions in the teeth with coronal sealing. On the other hand, when coronal sealing was not performed, greater intensity of induced periapical periodontitis was observed in the teeth with apical perforation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanomaru, J. M. G., Leonardo, M. R., Silva, L. A. B., Poliseli-Neto, Â., & Tanomaru-Filho, M. (2008). Histopathological evaluation of different methods of experimental induction of periapical periodontitis. Brazilian Dental Journal, 19(3), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402008000300012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free