Early detection of COPD in general practice: Patient or practice managed? A randomised controlled trial of two strategies in different socioeconomic environments

35Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is high. Health benefits can be gained in primary care by early detection and preventive measures. Aims: To compare the effectiveness of two strategies for population-based early detection of COPD, taking into account different socioeconomic status (SES) settings. Methods: Practices were randomised on strategy and stratified on SES setting. The Respiratory Health Screening Questionnaire (RHSQ) was distributed to all participants. In the practice-managed condition, the practice was responsible for the whole procedure, while in the patient-managed condition, patients were responsible for calculating their RHSQ risk score and applying for a spirometry test. The main outcome measure was the rate of COPD diagnoses after screening. Results: More new COPD patients were detected in the practice-managed condition (36%) than in the patient-managed condition (18%). In low SES practices, more high-risk patients were found (16%) than in moderate-to-high SES practices (9%). Recalculated for a standard Dutch practice (2,350 patients), the yield would be 8.9 new COPD diagnoses, which is a 20% increase of known cases. Conclusions: The practice-managed variant of this screening procedure shows a substantial yield of new COPD diagnoses for both low and moderate-to-high SES practices. © 2013 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dirven, J. A. M., Tange, H. J., Muris, J. W. M., van Haaren, K. M. A., Vink, G., & van Schayck, O. C. P. (2013). Early detection of COPD in general practice: Patient or practice managed? A randomised controlled trial of two strategies in different socioeconomic environments. Primary Care Respiratory Journal, 22(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free