Does primary care mental health resourcing affect the use and costs of secondary psychiatric services?

13Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Collaborative care models for treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in primary care have been shown to be effective. The aim of this study was to investigate at the municipal level to what extent investment in mental health personnel at primary care health centres in the study area is reflected in the costs and use of secondary psychiatric services. Furthermore, we analysed whether the service provision and use of secondary psychiatric care correlates with the socioeconomic indicators of need. We found significant variation in the amount of mental health personnel provided at the health centres, uncorrelated with the indicators of need nor with the costs of secondary psychiatric care. The amount of mental health nurses at the health centres correlated inversely with the number of secondary psychiatric outpatient visits, whereas its relation to inpatient days and admission was positive. The costs of secondary psychiatric care correlated with level of psychiatric morbidity and socioeconomic indicators of need. The results suggest that when aiming at equal access of care and cost-efficiency, the primary and secondary care should be organized and planned with integrative collaboration. © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadeniemi, M., Pirkola, S., Pankakoski, M., Joffe, G., Kontio, R., Malin, M., … Wahlbeck, K. (2014). Does primary care mental health resourcing affect the use and costs of secondary psychiatric services? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(9), 8743–8754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110908743

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free