Configuring political relationships to navigate host-country institutional complexity: Insights from Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa

16Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examine how ties with multiple host-country political institutions contribute to MNE subsidiary performance in countries with weak formal institutions. We suggest that forging relationships between subsidiaries and host-country government actors, local chieftains, and religious leaders generates regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive political resources. We integrate institutional and configuration theories to argue that similarity to an ideal configuration of the three political resources contributes to MNE subsidiary performance, and that the more dysfunctional host-country institutions, the greater the impact on performance. We test our hypotheses using primary and archival data from 604 MNE subsidiaries in 23 Anglophone sub-Saharan African countries and find support for our hypotheses. In our conclusion, we discuss the wider theoretical, managerial, and public-policy implications of our findings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boso, N., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Essuman, D., Olabode, O. E., Bruce, P., Hultman, M., … Adeola, O. (2023). Configuring political relationships to navigate host-country institutional complexity: Insights from Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(6), 1055–1089. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00594-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free