Background: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating lock solutions for use in non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Methods: We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases from inception to June 11, 2021. Study inclusion criteria were: randomized trial or observational study, adults (>18 years), with acute kidney injury (AKI); and temporary non-tunneled catheters. We recorded bleeding events, catheter dysfunction and complications. Results: Of 649 studies identified, 6 were included (4 randomized, 1 non-randomized trial, 1 retrospective cohort study; sample sizes 78–1496 patients). Citrate was compared to heparin in 4 studies, to saline in 1, and ethanol versus saline in 1. Event-free survival of non-tunneled catheters did not differ between groups. Catheter-related infections and adverse events were less frequent with citrate locks, but reached statistical significance in only two studies. Conclusion: Existing data are too heterogeneous to enable recommending one type of catheter lock over any other for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
CITATION STYLE
Boucley, I., Dargent, A., Andreu, P., Roudaut, J. B., Aptel, F., Labruyère, M., … Quenot, J. P. (2023). Systematic review of locking solutions for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Hemodialysis International, 27(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13047
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.