On reachability, relevance, and resolution in the planning as satisfiability approach

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, there is a growing awareness of the importance of reachability and relevance-based pruning techniques for planning, but little work specifically targets these techniques. In this paper, we compare the ability of two classes of algorithms to propagate and discover reachability and relevance constraints in classical planning problems. The first class of algorithms operates on SAT encoded planning problems obtained using the linear and GRAPHPLAN encoding schemes. It applies unit-propagation and more general resolution steps (involving larger clauses) to these plan encodings. The second class operates at the plan level and contains two families of pruning algorithms: Reachable-k and Relevant-k. Reachable-k provides a coherent description of a number of existing forward pruning techniques used in numerous algorithms, while Relevant-k captures different grades of backward pruning. Our results shed light on the ability of different plan-encoding schemes to propagate information forward and backward and on the relative merit of plan-level and SAT-level pruning methods. ©2001 AI Access Foundation and Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brafman, R. I. (2001). On reachability, relevance, and resolution in the planning as satisfiability approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 14, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.737

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free