Abstract
Two recent articles were written in response to our paper “Breaking RAD: An evaluation of the utility of restriction site associated DNA sequencing scans of adapta-tion.” While we agree with some of the comments made by the authors of these two response papers, we still believe caution should be employed in RADseq studies that aim to detect loci that contribute to adaptation. In this rebuttal, we evaluate the key points made in these papers, attempt to identify a middle ground and make suggestions for responsibly conducting future studies to understand the genome-wide mechanisms of adaptation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lowry, D. B., Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Reed, L. K., Antolin, M. F., & Storfer, A. (2017). Responsible RAD: Striving for best practices in population genomic studies of adaptation. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17(3), 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12677
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.