A machine learning approach to classify mental workload based on eye tracking data

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to develop machine learning algorithms for classifying mental workload using eye tracking data. Four participants (two females and two males) performed the N-Back memory task and National Aeronautics and Space Administration-task load index (NASA-TLX) to induce different levels of mental workload. Twenty-seven eye tracking metrics were selected as independent variables. One output variable reflecting the difficulty level of N-Back memory was classified As a result of these experiments, it was revealed that almost all eye tracking metrics considered in this study were significantly correlated to both weighted NASA-TLX total score and N-Back memory task difficulty level. As the task difficulty increased, pupil diameter, number of saccades, number of blinks, and blink duration increased, while fixation duration decreased. The results obtained for the two classes of classification problem reached the accuracy of 68% with 14 eye-tracking features due to problem complexity. The results obtained for the two classes of classification problem reached the accuracy of 84% with 27 eye-tracking features as input and the LightGBM algorithm. To determine the degree to which the input variables contribute to the determination of the output variable, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using the gradient boosting machines (GBM) algorithm. The left eye pupil diameter was found to be the most effective metric in the classification of the task difficulty level. The results from the analysis indicate that eye tracking metrics play an important role in the classification of mental workload.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aksu, Ş. H., & Çakıt, E. (2023). A machine learning approach to classify mental workload based on eye tracking data. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 38(2), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1049979

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free