Generative AI and the social fabric of organizations

11Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools is provoking intense debate about their potential to boost productivity, stimulate creativity, or disrupt employment. While insightful, these discrete, short-term metrics risk obscuring GenAI’s deeper and longer-term implications for the social fabric of organizations—that is, the ways in which pathways of organizational members interweave in the course of everyday work. In this essay, we identify three sociotechnical characteristics of GenAI use in the workplace—its multipurpose usability, unpredictable plausibility, and hyper-personalizability—and outline how they can reroute the ways employees cross paths, interact, and exchange resources in everyday work. We consider two contrasting scenarios. Under a laissez-faire scenario, GenAI use can disrupt the flows of resources, such as expertise, trust, and collegiality within the organization—in what we refer to as the rise of GenAI “polymaths,” “oracles,” and “sirens” in the workplace. Under a cultivation scenario, by contrast, generative artificial intelligence use is deliberately weaved into the meshwork of everyday work pathways in ways that strengthen, rather than erode, the social fabric that holds the organization together.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baygi, R. M., & Huysman, M. (2026). Generative AI and the social fabric of organizations. Strategic Organization, 24(2 Special Issue: The question of intelligent technology), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270251385456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free