Is parenteral nutrition guilty?

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

“Death by parenteral nutrition” was the title of the controversial editorial published in the June issue of Intensive Care Medicine by P.E. Marik and M. Pinsky [1]. One might believe that a real event was being described by the authors. Imagine our astonishment, which quickly turned to dismay, when we read the words: “… a poison or toxin is a substance that through its chemical action usually kills, injures or impairs an organism… and by this definition TPN meets all criteria of a poison/toxin, in the critically ill patient receiving parenteral nutrition.” We are surprised and perturbed that the authors have missed some important issues regarding the nutrition of patients in intensive care units (ICUs), exchanging sensationalism for sound scientific discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varga, P., Griffiths, R., Chiolero, R., Nitenberg, G., Leverve, X., Pertkiewicz, M., … Preiser, J. C. (2012). Is parenteral nutrition guilty? In Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine 2: Physiological Reviews and Editorials (pp. 355–358). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28233-1_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free