Epistemic Optimism, Speculation, and the Historical Sciences

  • Currie A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This is the final version. Available from Michigan Publishing via the DOI in this record.I summarize the central ideas and arguments of Rock, Bone and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences, before responding to criticisms from Leonard Finkelman, Joyce Havstad, Derek Turner and Alison Wylie. These cover whether, and to what extent, we can establish optimism about the historical sciences, the distinctions between ‘trace-based’ and ‘non-trace’ evidence, and between experiments and models, and the purpose and limits of speculation in scientific reasoning.John Templeton Foundatio

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Currie, A. (2019). Epistemic Optimism, Speculation, and the Historical Sciences. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 11(20220112). https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free