Abstract
Despite questions about academic rigor, undergraduates use Wikipedia for opportunistic learning: self-regulated study to learn, relearn, or be introduced to concepts. STEM topics are potentially immune from some of Wikipedia’s criticism, as many are based on well-established facts. This article evaluates 28 articles from seven STEM disciplines on four criteria important for undergraduate opportunistic learners. Some articles contained inaccuracies, while common criticisms included poor conceptual development, poor procedural explanations, poor diagrams and failing to utilize internet technologies. Often, the best advice is to read the first paragraph: the rest of the article generally did not enhance opportunistic learning.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dunn, P. K., Brunton, E., Marshman, M., McDougall, R., Kent, D., Masters, N., & McKay, D. (2023). The First Paragraph Is As Good As It Gets: STEM Articles in Wikipedia and Opportunistic Learning. College Teaching, 71(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.2004387
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.