Long-Run versus short-run perspectives on consumer scheduling: Evidence from a revealed-preference experiment among peak-hour road commuters

29Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Earlier studies on scheduling behavior have mostly ignored that consumers have more flexibility to adjust their schedule in the long run than in the short run. We introduce the distinction between long-run choices of travel routines and short-run choices of departure times, using data from a real-life peak avoidance experiment. We find that participants value travel time higher in the long-run context, supposedly because changes in travel time can be exploited better through the adjustment of routines. Schedule delays are valued higher in the short run, reflecting that scheduling restrictions are typically more binding in the short run.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peer, S., Verhoef, E., Knockaert, J., Koster, P., & Tseng, Y. Y. (2015). Long-Run versus short-run perspectives on consumer scheduling: Evidence from a revealed-preference experiment among peak-hour road commuters. International Economic Review, 56(1), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free