Clinical and laboratory features of 78 cases of T-prolymphocytic leukemia

  • Matutes E
  • Brito-Babapulle V
  • Swansbury J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We describe the clinical and laboratory findings of 78 adult patients with T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) studied over the last 12 years. The main disease features were splenomegaly (73%), lymphadenopathy (53%), hepatomegaly (40%), skin lesions (27%), and a high leukocyte count (greater than 100 x 10(9)/L in 75%) with nucleolated prolymphocytes. A variant form with small, less typical cells was recognized in 19%. Membrane markers defined a postthymic phenotype TdT- , CD2+, CD3+, CD5+, CD7+; in 65%, the cells were CD4+ CD8-, in 21%, they coexpressed CD4 and CD8, and, in 13%, they were CD4- CD8+. Serology for human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus Type-I (HTLV-I) was negative in the 27 cases investigated. Cytogenetic analysis in 30 cases showed a consistent abnormality of chromosome 14, usually inv (14), with breakpoints at q11 and q32 in 76% of cases. Trisomy 8, including iso8q, was shown in 53%; t (11;14)(q13;q32) was documented in one case; and one had a normal karyotype. The clinical course was progressive with a median survival of 7.5 months. Thirty-one patients were treated with 2′ deoxycoformycin and 15 responded (3 complete remissions and 12 partial remissions); the response rate (48%) increased to 58% in patients with a CD4+ CD8- phenotype. The median survival of responders was 16 months and of nonresponders 10 months; other treatments were less effective. T-PLL is a distinct clinico-pathologic entity with aggressive course and characteristic chromosome abnormalities. A subgroup of patients may benefit from deoxycoformycin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matutes, E., Brito-Babapulle, V., Swansbury, J., Ellis, J., Morilla, R., Dearden, C., … Catovsky, D. (1991). Clinical and laboratory features of 78 cases of T-prolymphocytic leukemia. Blood, 78(12), 3269–3274. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v78.12.3269.bloodjournal78123269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free