We advance a complexity−grounded, quantitative method for uncovering temporal patterns in CSCL discussions. We focus on convergence because understanding how complex group discussions converge presents a major challenge in CSCL research. From a complex systems perspective, convergence in group discussions is an emergent behavior arising from the transactional interactions between group members. Leveraging the concepts of emergent simplicity and emergent complexity (Bar-Yam 2003), a set of theoretically-sound yet simple rules was hypothesized: Interactions between group members were conceptualized as goal-seeking adaptations that either help the group move towards or away from its goal, or maintain its status quo. Operationalizing this movement as a Markov walk, we present quantitative and qualitative findings from a study of online problem-solving groups. Findings suggest high (or low) quality contributions have a greater positive (or negative) impact on convergence when they come earlier in a discussion than later. Significantly, convergence analysis was able to predict a group’s performance based on what happened in the first 30–40% of its discussion. Findings and their implications for CSCL theory, methodology, and design are discussed.
CITATION STYLE
Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2011). A Complexity-Grounded Model for the Emergence of Convergence in CSCL Groups. In Analyzing Interactions in CSCL (pp. 3–23). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.