Correlating self-efficacy with self-assessment in an undergraduate interpreting classroom: How accurate can students be?

4Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The current paper intends to explore whether there are significant correlations between students’ self-efficacy and their self-assessment accuracy and how the former mediates the latter. Framed within an undergraduate interpreting classroom in China, which shares similar pedagogical aims with general foreign language courses, a total of 53 senior students completed an Interpreting Self-Efficacy (ISE) Scale before self-assessing their English-Chinese consecutive interpreting performance. Spearman correlation tests were employed to investigate the correlations between students’ ISE level and their self-assess-ment accuracy, compared with the teacher’s marks. Although ISE and self-assessment accuracy were positively correlated, the relation was not significant. Medium to low level ISE could only vaguely predict students’ self-assessment performance, but students were capable of accurate self-assessment regardless of their ISE level. This justifies more rigorous reflection on self-regulated learning enabled by accurate self-assessment in language class-rooms, which is simultaneously informed by multiple social and psychological variables experienced by individual learners, such as self-efficacy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, J. (2021). Correlating self-efficacy with self-assessment in an undergraduate interpreting classroom: How accurate can students be? Porta Linguarum, 2021(36), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.30827/PORTALIN.V0I36.13897

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free