Biofield Frequency Bands—Definitions and Group Differences

1Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the biofield literature, it is suggested that electromagnetic energy is part of the biofield. However, little is known about the exact definition of potential electromagnetic biofield frequency bands (FBs). Primary Study Objective: The current study sought to identify biofield FBs and test potential group differences. Methods/Design: High-frequency (i.e. >200 Hertz) voltage was measured at body parts along the spine and the brain. Setting: Measurements were conducted in an electrically shielded laboratory. Participants: Twenty experienced biofield practitioners (BPs, sample 1) and twenty-four students (STs, sample 2) participated in the study. Interventions: The BPs performed a wide set of biofield exercises, while the STs participated in an assessment centre (with exercises such as role play). A total of N = 342 exercises were performed. Primary Outcome Measures: Based on surface electromyography, high-frequency (i.e., >200 Hertz) voltage was utilized as outcome measure. Results: 10 FBs were identified across all the data sets. The BPs had higher spectral power across these bands compared to the STs. Conclusion: The present paper presents a replicable method for the assessment of electromagnetic FBs which are potentially useful for future biofield research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rowold, J., & Hewson, P. D. (2020). Biofield Frequency Bands—Definitions and Group Differences. Global Advances In Health and Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2164956120982568

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free