Differentiating Pseudo Versus True Aortic Stenosis in Patients Without Contractile Reserve: A Diagnostic Dilemma

Abstract

Low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis with depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is a diagnostic challenge that is frequently encountered in the management of valvular heart disease. True-severe LF-LG aortic stenosis is amenable to valve replacement, whereas pseudo-severe aortic stenosis requires management of the underlying cardiomyopathy. This distinction is important as it serves as a critical branch point in guiding therapeutic decisions. We present the case of a 71-year-old male with LF-LG aortic stenosis who had a reduced and biphasic augmentation of LV flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Further evaluation revealed a stenotic left subclavian artery proximal to the left internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Bypass of the subclavian stenosis reversed the LAD territory ischemia and confirmed pseudo-severe aortic stenosis on repeat DSE. Traditional DSE parameters are inconclusive in patients with LF-LG aortic stenosis with poor flow reserve. Calculation of the projected orifice area or measurement of aortic valve calcium via multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may be required in this scenario. Most importantly, reversible causes of LV dysfunction identified during DSE for LF-LG aortic stenosis require a different treatment approach than that of true aortic stenosis.