Abstract
The ultimate tool, it could be said, is the brain and body. Therefore, a way to understand tool use is to study the brain's control of the body. A more manageable aim is to use the tools of cognitive science to explore the planning of physical actions. Here, I focus on two kinds of physical acts which directly or indirectly involve tool use: producing finger-press sequences, and walking and reaching for objects. The main question is how people make choices between finger-press sequences, and how people make choices between walk-and-reach sequences. Are the choices made with reference to motor imagery, in which case the longer the sequences are the longer it takes to choose between them, or are shortcuts taken which rely on distinctive features of the alternatives? The reviewed experiments favor the latter alternative. The general view of action planning emerging from this work is one in which action features are highlighted and held in memory, not just to choose between potential actions but also to control the unfolding of long actions over time. Speculations are offered about tool use.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rosenbaum, D. A. (2021). The Ultimate Tool: The Body, Planning of Physical Actions, and the Role of Mental Imagery in Choosing Motor Acts. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(4), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12561
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.