Defining transgene insertion sites and off-target effects of homology-based gene silencing informs the application of functional genomics tools in phytophthora infestans

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

DNA transformation and homology-based transcriptional silencing are frequently used to assess gene function in Phytophthora spp. Since unplanned side-effects of these tools are not well-characterized, we used P. infestans to study plasmid integration sites and whether knockdowns caused by homology-dependent silencing spread to other genes. Insertions occurred both in gene-dense and gene-sparse regions but disproportionately near the 59 ends of genes, which disrupted native coding sequences. Microhomology at the recombination site between plasmid and chromosome was common. Studies of transformants silenced for 12 different gene targets indicated that neighbors within 500 nt were often cosilenced, regardless of whether hairpin or sense constructs were employed and the direction of transcription of the target. However, this cis spreading of silencing did not occur in all transformants obtained with the same plasmid. Genome-wide studies indicated that unlinked genes with partial complementarity with the silencing-inducing transgene were not usually down-regulated. We learned that hairpin or sense transgenes were not cosilenced with the target in all transformants, which informs how screens for silencing should be performed. We conclude that transformation and gene silencing can be reliable tools for functional genomics in Phytophthora spp. but must be used carefully, especially by testing for the spread of silencing to genes flanking the target.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vu, A. L., Leesutthiphonchai, W., Ah-Fong, A. M. V., & Judelson, H. S. (2019). Defining transgene insertion sites and off-target effects of homology-based gene silencing informs the application of functional genomics tools in phytophthora infestans. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 32(8), 915–927. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-18-0265-TA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free