Heart rate variability predicts 30-day all-cause mortality in intensive care units

9Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Autonomic nervous function, as quantified by heart rate variability (HRV), has shown promise in predicting clinically important outcomes in the critical care setting; however, there is debate concerning its utility. HRV analysis was assessed as a practical tool for outcome prediction in two South African hospitals and compared with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring. Method: In a dual centre, prospective, observational cohort study of patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) of two hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa frequency domain HRV parameters were explored as predictors of: all-cause mortality at 30 days after admission; ICU stay duration; the need for invasive ventilation; the need for inotrope/vasopressor therapy; and the need for renal replacement therapy. The predictive ability of HRV parameters against the APACHE II score for the study outcomes was also compared. Results: A total of 55 patients were included in the study. Very low frequency power (VLF) was shown to predict 30-day mortality in ICU (odds ratio 0.6; 95% confidence interval 0.396-0.911). When compared with APACHE II, VLF remained a significant predictor of outcome, suggesting that it adds a unique component of prediction. No HRV parameters were predictive for the other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: This study found that VLF independently predicted all-cause mortality at 30 days after ICU admission. VLF provided additional predictive ability above that of the APACHE II score. As suggested by this exploratory analysis larger multi-centre studies seem warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bishop, D. G., Wise, R. D., Lee, C., Von Rahden, R. P., & Rodseth, R. N. (2016). Heart rate variability predicts 30-day all-cause mortality in intensive care units. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 22(4), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2016.1202605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free