The Pattern of Maxillofacial Trauma & its Management

  • Amjad Shah S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The descriptive study was undertaken to determine the pattern and different methods of treatment of maxillofacial fractures. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and twenty consecutive patients with maxillofacial trauma were treated in a tertiary care hospital in last three years. A review of patients' records and radiographs was conducted. Data regarding age, gender, cause of fracture, anatomic site and treatment modalities were reviewed. Results: The age range was 2-76 years (25±8) with peak frequency occurring in age group 21-30 years. The male to female ratio was 5.4: 1. The study indicated that (n=206; 64.7%) resulted from road traffic accidents (rtas) followed by fall (n=60; 18.8%), assault (n=26; 8.1%), sports (n=17; 5.3%), firearm injury [FAI (n=3; 0.9%)], industrial trauma (n=2; 0.6%) while 5cases (1.65%) were associated with other causes such as bomb blast, animal injury etc. The mandible was the most commonly involved (69.7%) followed by zygomatic complex [ZC (8.4%)], maxilla (5.3%), nasal bone (1.3%) and nasoethmoidal fractures (0.9%); in 14.4% of cases, more than one facial bone fracture occurred. Of mandibular fractures, body (30.3%) was the most common site followed by condylar region (24.2%). In midface fractures the ZC was the most susceptible area (48.2% of midface); of maxillary fractures, Le Fort I was the most common fracture (34.5%); the frequency of nasal (7.1%) & nasoethmoidal (5.4%) remained low. Most patients with mandibular fractures were treated by closed reduction surgery [eyelet wiring, arch bars with inter maxillary fixation (IMF) &splint fixation], only 18.9% of patients were treated with open reduction surgery (Interosseous &miniplates fixation). The maxillary fractures were mostly treated with suspension wiring while in ZC fractures Gillies' approach (37.9%) was the common method of management. Conclusion: This study reflects trauma patterns within the community and, as such, can provide a guide to the design of programs geared toward prevention and treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amjad Shah, S. (2016). The Pattern of Maxillofacial Trauma & its Management. Journal of Dentistry, Oral Disorders & Therapy, 4(4), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.15226/jdodt.2016.00165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free