Comparison between manual and semiautomated volumetric measurements of pituitary adenomas

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Linear measurements have many limitations. The aim of this study is to compare manual and semiautomated volumetric measurements of pituitary adenomas. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 38 patients with pituitary adenomas were analyzed. Preoperative MRI was acquired on a 1.5 T. MRI volumes of the pituitary adenomas were obtained by two methods: manual (MA) and semiautomated (SA). The concurrent validity for SA and MA methods on 38 patients in the form of correlation coefficient was 0.97 (p<0.0001). The intraobserver and the interobserver correlation coefficients for SA volumes were both 0.98, as for the intraobserver MA volumes were 0.98. Although the results of both methods are comparable, analysis of volumetric measurements by SA method is more time-efficient than MA segmentation. Precision in volumetric measurement techniques is likely to increase reliability of posttherapeutic monitoring of pituitary adenomas. Copyright © 2011 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Hinai, Q., Mok, K., Zeitouni, A., Gagnon, B., Ajlan, A. R., Rivera, J., … Sirhan, D. (2011). Comparison between manual and semiautomated volumetric measurements of pituitary adenomas. Skull Base, 21(6), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1287677

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free