Cutting to Live: A Phenomenology of Self-Harm

65Citations
Citations of this article
179Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This exploratory study utilizes a phenomenological methodology as described by Moustakas (Phenomenological research methods, Sage Publications, 1994). Data were gathered via qualitative face-to-face interviews from a midsize southwestern community. Eleven participants, ten females and one male, were included in this study. Data suggested three categories that described the participants' experiences of self-harm: Self-harm is Misunderstood, Self-Harm has a Role, and Advice to Professionals. Among these categories, 11 themes emerged, including Self-Harm is Not Suicide, Self-Harm is an Addiction, Individuals Who Self-Harm are Traumatized, Help That's Not Helpful, Self-Harm is a Release, Physical Pain versus Emotional Pain, Self-Harm IS Control, and Need to be Punished. Advice to professionals who work with individuals who self-harm is offered by the participants. The study concludes with a discussion of the phenomenon of self-harm, as well as clinical and training implications for professionals. Future directions for research are also discussed. © 2012 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, T. B., & Kimball, T. (2013). Cutting to Live: A Phenomenology of Self-Harm. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00270.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free