Manometric Abnormalities in Patients With and Without Chronic Cough

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the relationship between chronic cough and vagal hypersensitivity by measuring baseline esophageal motility, with interest in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Materials and methods: Patients undergoing workup for dysphagia were assigned to a chronic cough or control group based on self-reported symptoms. Differences in demographics, medical comorbidities, and high resolution esophageal manometry findings were obtained retrospectively. Results: 62.5% of our cohort had chronic cough (30/48). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was the only statistically significant predictor of CC (OR 74.04, p = 0.010). Cough patients had upper esophageal sphincter relaxation duration (734 ms) significantly longer than the non-cough patients (582 ms; p = 0.03), though both groups had similar upper esophageal mean basal pressure, mean residual pressure, relaxation time-to-nadir, and recovery time. No significant difference was found in the median intrabolus pressure and UES motility mean peak pressure between groups. Conclusion: Subtle differences in high-resolution manometry between patients with and without cough suggest, in line with previous studies, baseline alterations of upper esophageal function may manifest in patients with chronic cough through an undetermined mechanism that may include underlying vagal hypersensitivity. These findings encourage further manometric study examining the relationship between UES dysfunction and chronic cough.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simmons, E., Adebowale, A., Banda, C., Watson, W. A., Qu, R., Becerra, B., … Krishna, P. (2024). Manometric Abnormalities in Patients With and Without Chronic Cough. American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, 45(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104445

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free