Interpreting the history of evolutionary biology through a kuhnian prism: Sense or nonsense?

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditionally, Thomas S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is largely identified with his analysis of the structure of scientific revolutions. Here, we contribute to a minority tradition in the Kuhn literature by interpreting the history of evolutionary biology through the prism of the entire historical developmental model of sciences that he elaborates in The Structure. This research not only reveals a certain match between this model and the history of evolutionary biology but, more importantly, also sheds new light on several episodes in that history, and particularly on the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859), the construction of the modern evolutionary synthesis, the chronic discontent with it, and the latest expression of that discontent, called the extended evolutionary synthesis. Lastly, we also explain why this kind of analysis hasn’t been done before.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanghe, K. B., Pauwels, L., De Tiège, A., & Braeckman, J. (2021). Interpreting the history of evolutionary biology through a kuhnian prism: Sense or nonsense? Perspectives on Science, 29(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00359

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free