“Blacklists” and “whitelists”: A salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing

23Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This commentary addresses the widespread use of racist language in discussions concerning predatory publishing. Examples include terminology such as blacklists, whitelists, and black sheep. The use of such terms does not merely reflect a racist culture, but also serves to legitimize and perpetuate it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Houghton, F., & Houghton, S. (2018). “Blacklists” and “whitelists”: A salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 527–530. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free