Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the trial was to quantify and compare the efficacy of two different sequences of burst anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) strategies for the termination of fast ventricular tachycardia. Methods The trial was prospective, multicenter, parallel and randomized, enrolling patients with an indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Results From February 2004, 925 patients were randomized and followed-up for 12 months. Eight pulses ATP terminated 64% of episodes vs. 70% in the 15-pulse group (p=0.504). Fifteen pulses proved significantly better in patients without a previous history of heart failure (p=0.014) and in patients with LVEF>40% (p=0.016). No significant differences between groups were observed with regard to syncope/ near-syncope occurrence. Conclusion In the general population, 15-pulse ATP is as effective and safe as eight-pulse ATP. The efficacy of ATP on fast ventricular arrhythmias confirmed once more the striking importance of careful device programming in order to reduce painful shocks. © The Author(s) 2010.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Santini, M., Lunati, M., Defaye, P., Mermi, J., Proclemer, A., Del Castillo-Arroys, S., … Kloppe, A. (2010). Prospective multicenter randomized trial of fast ventricular tachycardia termination by prolonged versus conventional anti-tachyarrhythmia burst pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients-Atp deliVery for pAiNless ICD thErapy (ADVANCE-D) trial results. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 27(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9454-z
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.