MicroRNA in vitro diagnostics using immunoassay analyzers

34Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The implementation of new biomarkers into clinical practice is one of the most important areas in medical research. Besides their clinical impact, novel in vitro diagnostic markers promise to have a substantial effect on healthcare costs. Although numerous publications report the discovery of biomarkers, only a fraction of those markers are routinely used. One key challenge is a measurement system that is compatible with clinical workflows. METHODS: We designed a new immunoassay for microRNA (miRNA) quantification. The assay combines streptavidin-linked microparticles, a biotinylated catcher oligonucleotide complementary to a single miRNA species, and finally, a monoclonal antibody to DNA/RNA heterohybrids labeled with acridinium ester. Importantly, our assay runs on standard immunoassay analyzers. After a technical validation of the assay, we evaluated the clinical performance on 4 Alzheimer disease miRNAs. RESULTS: Our assay has an analytical specificity of 99.4% and is at the same time sensitive (concentrations in the range of 1 pmol/L miRNA can be reliably profiled). Because the novel approach did not require amplification steps, we obtained high reproducibility for up to 40 biological replicates. Importantly, our assay prototype exhibited a time to result of <3 h. With human blood samples, the assay was able to measure 4 miRNAs that can detect Alzheimer disease with a diagnostic accuracy of 82% and showed a Pearson correlation >0.994 with the gold standard qRT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: Our miRNA immunoassay allowed the measurement of miRNA signatures with sufficient analytical sensitivity and high specificity on commonly available laboratory equipment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kappel, A., Backes, C., Huang, Y., Zafari, S., Leidinger, P., Meder, B., … Keller, A. (2015). MicroRNA in vitro diagnostics using immunoassay analyzers. Clinical Chemistry, 61(4), 600–607. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2014.232165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free