Comparing benzodithiophene unit with alkylthionaphthyl and alkylthiobiphenyl side-chains in constructing high-performance nonfullerene solar cells

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using single-bonded and fused aromatic rings are two methods for extending the π-conjugation in the vertical direction of benzo [1,2-b:4,5-b0] dithiophene (BDT) unit. To investigate which method is more efficient in nonfullerene systems, two novel polymers based on alkylthionaphthyl and alkylthiobiphenyl substituted BDT named PBDTNS-FTAZ and PBDTBPS-FTAZ are designed and synthesized. Two polymers only exhibit small differences in structure, but huge differences in photovoltaic properties. They are studied by blended with 3,9-bis(2-methylene-(3-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)indanone)-5,5,11,11-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)dithieno [2,3-d':2,3'-d']-s-indaceno [1,2-b:5,6-b'] dithiophene (ITIC). The device based on PBDTNS-FTAZ:ITIC showed the best power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.63% with the Voc of 0.87 V, a Jsc of 18.06 mA/cm2 and a fill factor of 61.21%, while the PBDTBPS-FTAZ:ITIC only exhibit a maximum PCE of 7.79% with a Voc of 0.86 V, a Jsc of 16.24 mA/cm2 and a relatively low fill factor of 55.92%. Therefore, extending π-conjugation with alkylthionaphthyl is more effective against constructing nonfullerene solar cells.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, R., Song, L., & Zhao, Z. (2020). Comparing benzodithiophene unit with alkylthionaphthyl and alkylthiobiphenyl side-chains in constructing high-performance nonfullerene solar cells. Polymers, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12081673

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free