Comparison of müller total hip replacement with and without trochanteric osteotomy: Kinesiologic measurements of 82 cases 2 years after surgery

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Function of 37 patients with osteotomy of the greater trochanter during total hip replacement (41 hips) is compared to function of 38 patients (41 hips) without osteotomy. Subjective assessments and cane force measurements were slightly more favorable in the group without osteotomy. Objective measurements of hip motion, hip abductor and adductor muscle strength, weight distribution during standing, and multiple components of free-speed and fast walking showed no statistically significant differences between performance of the groups with and without osteotomy before surgery or 6 months or 2 years after. This suggests that osteotomy provides no functional advantages to the patient beyond those obtained in total hip replacements without osteotomy. © 1981 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murray, M. P., Gore, D. R., Brewer, B. J., Gardner, G. M., & Sepic, S. B. (1981). Comparison of müller total hip replacement with and without trochanteric osteotomy: Kinesiologic measurements of 82 cases 2 years after surgery. Acta Orthopaedica, 52(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678109050113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free