Impact of System and Diagnostic Errors on Medical Litigation Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

No prediction models using use conventional logistic models and machine learning exist for medical litigation outcomes involving medical doctors. Using a logistic model and three machine learning models, such as decision tree, random forest, and light-gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), we evaluated the prediction ability for litigation outcomes among medical litigation in Japan. The prediction model with LightGBM had a good predictive ability, with an area under the curve of 0.894 (95% CI; 0.893–0.895) in all patients’ data. When evaluating the feature importance using the SHApley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) value, the system error was the most significant predictive factor in all clinical settings for medical doctors’ loss in lawsuits. The other predictive factors were diagnostic error in outpatient settings, facility size in inpatients, and procedures or surgery settings. Our prediction model is useful for estimating medical litigation outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamamoto, N., Sukegawa, S., & Watari, T. (2022). Impact of System and Diagnostic Errors on Medical Litigation Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models. Healthcare (Switzerland), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050892

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free