Repeal of the Pennsylvania motorcycle helmet law: Reflections on the ethical and political dynamics of public health reform

4Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.

Abstract

Background. In June of 2003 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania passed S. 259 which repealed the state's 35-year old motorcycle helmet safety law. Motorcycle helmets are now only required for riders who are under the age of 21 and for those who are 21 years or older who have had a motorcycle operator's license for less than two years, or who have not completed an approved motorcycle safety course. Discussion. Prior to the repeal, and in the years that have followed, there has been intense debate and controversy regarding Pennsylvania's decision to repeal the law that required universal and mandatory use of motorcycle helmets for all riders. Proponents of the helmet repeal have argued in favor of individual rights and freedom, whereas advocates for mandatory helmet laws have voiced concerns over public health and safety based on available data. Summary. This commentary will discuss the policy-making process that led to Pennsylvania's repeal of the motorcycle helmet safety law from an ethical, political, and economic perspective. © 2010 Cherry; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cherry, R. A. (2010). Repeal of the Pennsylvania motorcycle helmet law: Reflections on the ethical and political dynamics of public health reform. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-202

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free