Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases

48Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The conventional criteria for evaluating genetic tests include analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. Analytical validity refers to a test's ability to measure the genotype of interest accurately and reliably. Clinical validity refers to a test's ability to detect or predict the clinical disorder or phenotype associated with the genotype. Clinical utility of a test is a measure of its usefulness in the clinic and resulting changes in clinical endpoints. In addition, the utility to individuals and families of genomic information, or personal utility, should be considered. This chapter identifies methodological and data issues involved in assessing each type of validity or utility. The validity and utility of a test must be considered in a specific context, which include diagnostic testing, newborn screening, prenatal carrier screening, and family or cascade screening. Specific rare disorders addressed include cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Huntington disease, as well as cancer associated with BRCA mutations. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grosse, S. D., Kalman, L., & Khoury, M. J. (2010). Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 686, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free