FLAIR2 post-processing: improving MS lesion detection in standard MS imaging protocols

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Technical improvements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition, such as higher field strength and optimized sequences, lead to better multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion detection and characterization. Multiplication of 3D-FLAIR with 3D-T2 sequences (FLAIR2) results in isovoxel images with increased contrast-to-noise ratio, increased white–gray-matter contrast, and improved MS lesion visualization without increasing MRI acquisition time. The current study aims to assess the potential of 3D-FLAIR2 in detecting cortical/leucocortical (LC), juxtacortical (JC), and white matter (WM) lesions. Objective: To compare lesion detection of 3D-FLAIR2 with state-of-the-art 3D-T2-FLAIR and 3D-T2-weighted images. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed MRI scans of thirteen MS patients, showing previously noted high cortical lesion load. Scans were acquired using a 3 T MRI scanner. WM, JC, and LC lesions were manually labeled and manually counted after randomization of 3D-T2, 3D-FLAIR, and 3D-FLAIR2 scans using the ITK-SNAP tool. Results: LC lesion visibility was significantly improved by 3D-FLAIR2 in comparison to 3D-FLAIR (4 vs 1; p = 0.018) and 3D-T2 (4 vs 1; p = 0.007). Comparing LC lesion detection in 3D-FLAIR2 vs. 3D-FLAIR, 3D-FLAIR2 detected on average 3.2 more cortical lesions (95% CI − 9.1 to 2.8). Comparing against 3D-T2, 3D-FLAIR2 detected on average 3.7 more LC lesions (95% CI 3.3–10.7). Conclusions: 3D-FLAIR2 is an easily applicable time-sparing MR post-processing method to improve cortical lesion detection. Larger sampled studies are warranted to validate the sensitivity and specificity of 3D-FLAIR2.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zrzavy, T., Wielandner, A., Haider, L., Bartsch, S., Leutmezer, F., Berger, T., … Kasprian, G. (2022). FLAIR2 post-processing: improving MS lesion detection in standard MS imaging protocols. Journal of Neurology, 269(1), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10833-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free