The Center-Center Image Closely Approximates Other Methods for Syndesmosis Reduction Clamp Placement

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The optimal placement for a syndesmosis reduction clamp remains an open question. This study compared the center-center axis, which localizes clamp placement using only an internally rotated lateral ankle X-ray, with other common approaches, whose accuracy can only be confirmed using computed tomography (CT). Methods: Bone models of anatomically aligned (n = 6) and malreduced (n = 48) limbs were generated from CT scans of cadaveric specimens. Four axes for guiding clamp placement (center-center, centroid, B2, and trans-syndesmotic) were then analyzed, using digitally reconstructed radiographs derived from the bone models. Each axis’ location was defined using angle-height pairs that describe axis orientation along the full anatomical region where syndesmosis fixation occurs. Results: In anatomically aligned limbs, the center-center axis was located on average (±95% CI [confidence interval]), 0.64° (±0.50°) internal rotation, 1.03° (±0.73°) internal rotation, and 2.09° (±7.29°) external rotation from the centroid, B2, and trans-syndesmotic axes, respectively. Fibular displacement altered the magnitude of limb rotation needed to identify the center-center axis. Conclusion: The center-center technique is a valid method that closely approximates previously described methods for syndesmosis clamp placement without using CT, and the magnitude of C-arm rotation needed to transition from a talar dome lateral to a center-center view may be a potential method for assessing syndesmosis reduction. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jackson, N. J., Flores, K., Blake, A., Harley, J. B., Reb, C. W., & Nichols, J. A. (2025). The Center-Center Image Closely Approximates Other Methods for Syndesmosis Reduction Clamp Placement. Foot and Ankle Specialist, 18(6), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231213741

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free