Motor Strokes

  • Liepert J
  • Restemeyer C
  • Kucinski T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of lesion location on motor excitability and motor performance. Methods— We studied patients with pure motor strokes in 4 different brain areas: motor cortex lesions (n=7), striatocapsular lesions (n=13), lacunar lesions of the internal capsule (n=13), and paramedian pontine lesions (n=10). Motor performance tests included the 9-hole-peg test and grip strength recordings. Motor excitability was determined by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor thresholds, stimulus-response curves, silent periods, motor cortical inhibition, and facilitation were investigated. Results— The 4 groups were clinically similar but showed major differences in motor excitability. Only motor cortex lesions had a loss of intracortical inhibition in the affected hemisphere. In the internal capsule lesion group and the pontine lesion group, stimulus-response curves were depressed on the affected side. All of the subcortical lesions showed a prolongation of the silent period in the paretic side. Motor thresholds were predominantly elevated in the lesioned hemisphere of patients with internal capsule or pontine lesions. Motor performance was correlated with silent period duration in internal capsule lesions and with motor thresholds in internal capsule and pontine lesions. Conclusions— Motor cortex lesions exhibited deficient inhibitory properties. In contrast, subcortical lesions displayed an enhancement of inhibition. Internal capsule and pontine lesions affecting the corticospinal tract on different levels particularly impaired neuronal recruitment. Our results suggest that the lesion location determines a specific pattern of motor excitability changes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liepert, J., Restemeyer, C., Kucinski, T., Zittel, S., & Weiller, C. (2005). Motor Strokes. Stroke, 36(12), 2648–2648. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000189629.10603.02

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free