Experimental verification of the behavioral foundation of bacterial transport parameters using microfluidics

84Citations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present novel microfluidic experiments to quantify population-scale transport parameters (chemotactic sensitivity χ0 and random motility μ) of a population of bacteria. Previously, transport parameters have been derived theoretically from single-cell swimming behavior using probabilistic models, yet the mechanistic foundations of this upscaling process have not been verified experimentally. We designed a microfluidic capillary assay to generate and accurately measure gradients of chemoattractant (α-methylaspartate) while simultaneously capturing the swimming trajectories of individual Escherichia coli bacteria using videomicroscopy and cell tracking. By measuring swimming speed and bias in the swimming direction of single cells for a range of chemoattractant concentrations and concentration gradients, we directly computed the chemotactic velocity VC and the associated chemotactic sensitivity χ0. We then show how μ can also be readily determined using microfluidics but that a population-scale microfluidic approach is experimentally more convenient than a single-cell analysis in this case. Measured values of both χ0 [(12.4 ± 2.0) × 10-4 cm2 s-1] and m [(3.3 ± 0.8) × 10-6 cm2 s-1] are comparable to literature results. This microscale approach to bacterial chemotaxis lends experimental support to theoretical derivations of population-scale transport parameters from single-cell behavior. Furthermore, this study shows that microfluidic platforms can go beyond traditional chemotaxis assays and enable the quantification of bacterial transport parameters. © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, T., & Stocker, R. (2008). Experimental verification of the behavioral foundation of bacterial transport parameters using microfluidics. Biophysical Journal, 95(9), 4481–4493. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.108.134510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free