A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization and why we need one

89Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Enamel crystals are unique in shape, orientation and organization. They are hundreds of thousands times longer than they are wide, run parallel to each other, are oriented with respect to the ameloblast membrane at the mineralization front and are organized into rod or interrod enamel. The classical theory of amelogenesis postulates that extracellular matrix proteins shape crystallites by specifically inhibiting ion deposition on the crystal sides, orient them by binding multiple crystallites and establish higher levels of crystal organization. Elements of the classical theory are supported in principle by in vitro studies; however, the classical theory does not explain how enamel forms in vivo. In this review, we describe how amelogenesis is highly integrated with ameloblast cell activities and how the shape, orientation and organization of enamel mineral ribbons are established by a mineralization front apparatus along the secretory surface of the ameloblast cell membrane. © 2012 WCSS. All rights reserved 1674-2818/12.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simmer, J. P., Richardson, A. S., Hu, Y. Y., Smith, C. E., & Ching-Chun Hu, J. (2012, September). A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization and why we need one. International Journal of Oral Science. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.59

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free