A comparative study of the efficacy of topical nasal steroids versus systemic steroids in the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of using topical nasal steroids versus oral steroids in the treatment of otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Methods: One hundred (100) patients were included in the study, they were divided into two equal groups, group A received intranasal mometasone furoate spray once daily for 6 weeks, and group B received oral steroids in tapering doses for 6 weeks, plus systemic antibiotics, and nasal decongestants for both groups, tympanogram was done every 2 weeks for all patients. Results: Highly significant improvement (P < 0.01) of OME regarding symtoms, signs, and tympanometric results, occurred in each group separately at the end of the study, with no significant difference (P > 0.05) in improvement between the two groups. Conclusion: Both topical intranasal and oral steroids are effective medical therapy in the treatment of OME in children with no significant difference between the two methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anwar, M., Abdel-Aziz, M., Nassar, A., & Ismail, T. (2015). A comparative study of the efficacy of topical nasal steroids versus systemic steroids in the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children. Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 31(4), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.168210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free